Post by boomai jung on Sept 18, 2012 12:08:07 GMT -5
16 09 2012
I dreamed that I was in a large room, like a warehouse. Inside was some chairs tables and some foam shapes like one may find in an indoor childrens adventure playground, but other then that the room was kinda empty. There may have been a dark purple coloured carpet also
there was a smaller room off to the side that I seemed to be using as an office. It had a glass wall and door, and seemed indeed to be set up as an office, with a desk, computer and so forth
at the back of the main room was an old desktop computer, I think representative of my own. It had recently been wiped clean, but ran XP and had a few other things
It suddenly started to run a program, which I think was backing up all of the files in the computer or something. There was one move file on the computer, which was pornographic in nature. I was worried, because folk came and went, but when I thought about it it didn't bother me all that much. The program was doing something with this file, and was playing it in a largish window, while other things were going on on a background. There was no sound, and it was playing at about 3x speed, a little like a program like how a program like nero might while rendering a dvd file
the video started of in a pornographic nature. It depicted a small group of people, mostly women, hanging around a jacuzzi, touching one another and engaging in general sexual activity. After a short while, the video settled down to some members of the group just hanging out and talking. This took up the majorette of the video
this represents a strange situation I find myself in regarding the digital kangaroo girl saga, in that I have had dreams about posting a blog on the internet about an incident involving what I would call police corruption, about an alleged internet crime. And I am now having dreams regarding said report being up, as well as sorting out all of the dreams relating to it
I think a couple of videos sparked this, both on the subject of porn. I was watching allot of creepypasta videos and playing minecraft with sky, but I did take time ot watch some video from people that I subscribe to and watch on a semi regular bases
the first video was conference reports “affordable porn” where he talks about the usability (or affordences) of porn, as it relates to the usability of a powertools. I will respond to or link that video. The relevance of this video is hard to explain, but is something I was thinking about as I watched the video. If a body is designed by nature in the same way that a product is designed by a manufacture, to be aesthetically pleasing, and pornography works in the same way as product advertising (as does the format of the show Seseme Street), then what can possibly be unnatural or dangerous, so much so that it is deemed illegal, about someone being sexually aroused by a photograph of a horse or dead human body – something that has clearly been produced without reason to believe that anyone (or thing) was harmed during the process (or harmed without consent, maybe)
the other video is one on the liarpolitians channel and is titled “crooked GPS ignores law to prosecute 'obscene' porn (08Aug12)” (linked). This video consists of a ten minute clip of newsnight. On a story of barrister simon walsh who was prosecuted for possessing photographs depicting himself and others fisting, inserting items into the eips of penises, as well as being accused of having child porn sent by email
I would be outraged for this guy if it wasn't for one statement that he makes on the program. In short, “the act has a purpose, and that is to enable prosecutions to take place for pornography that would be caught by the obscene publications act, were it to be published in this country. What this act was actually used against me for was pictures that were taken of consenting activities by people in privet. Thats not what it was designed for, it was designed for extreme pornography, which is bestiality and necrophilia, not two or three people enjoying themselves in a bedroom” and “the law is correct, but the way it was interpreted in my case was quite wrong!” he also harps on about how the law was designed to stop dangerous activity, such as the insertion of knives
i'll ignore the fact that he carefully said 'consenting people' not 'consenting adults', and 'the jury decided that image was an image of an adult'. I will also assume that he would have no problem with the case of my computer being taken, or me being prosecuted for my “bestiality” images
in the case of necrophilia, such acts can be consensual, if, say, someone was to give consent in their will or something. I would also argue that, if someone hasn't specified what they want done with their body after death, and they weren't murdered by family or something, that the body should effectively become the property of the next of kin, to do with what they see fit, within reason
also, when I think of necrophilia, I think of the movie of the same name, which was really spiritual and peaceful, or jorden orens 'eros empire', or the first chapter of audery niffeneggers 'her fearful symmetry', which is quite moving and romantic. Compare this to a scene of three or so people shoving fists up peoples bottoms and things up peoples willies, and basically, who the hell is he to say what is or isn't extreme, in the way of sexual acts and porn?
It would seem to me that he that, like so many others, he is against any sexual activity of any kind, being enacted or otherwise enjoyed by any persons, except for that that he is personally into. I am not into necrophilia or fisting in any way, but have no problem with either, as they stand. Of course, necrophilia can be practised in such a way that is morally discussing, but it is also possible to fist a person in the course of rape. he also seems to be playing the gay card somewhat, even though fisting can be endured my anyone with access to a fist and a back side
the room I the dream was exceptional clean, which would pertain to my innocents, cleanness of my conscience, in regards to the file, the computer and my intentions
Crooked CPS ignore law to prosecute 'obscene' porn
Affordable porn (conferencereport)
I dreamed that I was in a large room, like a warehouse. Inside was some chairs tables and some foam shapes like one may find in an indoor childrens adventure playground, but other then that the room was kinda empty. There may have been a dark purple coloured carpet also
there was a smaller room off to the side that I seemed to be using as an office. It had a glass wall and door, and seemed indeed to be set up as an office, with a desk, computer and so forth
at the back of the main room was an old desktop computer, I think representative of my own. It had recently been wiped clean, but ran XP and had a few other things
It suddenly started to run a program, which I think was backing up all of the files in the computer or something. There was one move file on the computer, which was pornographic in nature. I was worried, because folk came and went, but when I thought about it it didn't bother me all that much. The program was doing something with this file, and was playing it in a largish window, while other things were going on on a background. There was no sound, and it was playing at about 3x speed, a little like a program like how a program like nero might while rendering a dvd file
the video started of in a pornographic nature. It depicted a small group of people, mostly women, hanging around a jacuzzi, touching one another and engaging in general sexual activity. After a short while, the video settled down to some members of the group just hanging out and talking. This took up the majorette of the video
this represents a strange situation I find myself in regarding the digital kangaroo girl saga, in that I have had dreams about posting a blog on the internet about an incident involving what I would call police corruption, about an alleged internet crime. And I am now having dreams regarding said report being up, as well as sorting out all of the dreams relating to it
I think a couple of videos sparked this, both on the subject of porn. I was watching allot of creepypasta videos and playing minecraft with sky, but I did take time ot watch some video from people that I subscribe to and watch on a semi regular bases
the first video was conference reports “affordable porn” where he talks about the usability (or affordences) of porn, as it relates to the usability of a powertools. I will respond to or link that video. The relevance of this video is hard to explain, but is something I was thinking about as I watched the video. If a body is designed by nature in the same way that a product is designed by a manufacture, to be aesthetically pleasing, and pornography works in the same way as product advertising (as does the format of the show Seseme Street), then what can possibly be unnatural or dangerous, so much so that it is deemed illegal, about someone being sexually aroused by a photograph of a horse or dead human body – something that has clearly been produced without reason to believe that anyone (or thing) was harmed during the process (or harmed without consent, maybe)
the other video is one on the liarpolitians channel and is titled “crooked GPS ignores law to prosecute 'obscene' porn (08Aug12)” (linked). This video consists of a ten minute clip of newsnight. On a story of barrister simon walsh who was prosecuted for possessing photographs depicting himself and others fisting, inserting items into the eips of penises, as well as being accused of having child porn sent by email
I would be outraged for this guy if it wasn't for one statement that he makes on the program. In short, “the act has a purpose, and that is to enable prosecutions to take place for pornography that would be caught by the obscene publications act, were it to be published in this country. What this act was actually used against me for was pictures that were taken of consenting activities by people in privet. Thats not what it was designed for, it was designed for extreme pornography, which is bestiality and necrophilia, not two or three people enjoying themselves in a bedroom” and “the law is correct, but the way it was interpreted in my case was quite wrong!” he also harps on about how the law was designed to stop dangerous activity, such as the insertion of knives
i'll ignore the fact that he carefully said 'consenting people' not 'consenting adults', and 'the jury decided that image was an image of an adult'. I will also assume that he would have no problem with the case of my computer being taken, or me being prosecuted for my “bestiality” images
in the case of necrophilia, such acts can be consensual, if, say, someone was to give consent in their will or something. I would also argue that, if someone hasn't specified what they want done with their body after death, and they weren't murdered by family or something, that the body should effectively become the property of the next of kin, to do with what they see fit, within reason
also, when I think of necrophilia, I think of the movie of the same name, which was really spiritual and peaceful, or jorden orens 'eros empire', or the first chapter of audery niffeneggers 'her fearful symmetry', which is quite moving and romantic. Compare this to a scene of three or so people shoving fists up peoples bottoms and things up peoples willies, and basically, who the hell is he to say what is or isn't extreme, in the way of sexual acts and porn?
It would seem to me that he that, like so many others, he is against any sexual activity of any kind, being enacted or otherwise enjoyed by any persons, except for that that he is personally into. I am not into necrophilia or fisting in any way, but have no problem with either, as they stand. Of course, necrophilia can be practised in such a way that is morally discussing, but it is also possible to fist a person in the course of rape. he also seems to be playing the gay card somewhat, even though fisting can be endured my anyone with access to a fist and a back side
the room I the dream was exceptional clean, which would pertain to my innocents, cleanness of my conscience, in regards to the file, the computer and my intentions
Crooked CPS ignore law to prosecute 'obscene' porn
Affordable porn (conferencereport)